Talk:Order disjoint list items: Difference between revisions

Talk:Order disjoint list items (view source)

485 bytes added , 3 years ago

no edit summary

404

edits

Revision as of 11:08, 13 October 2014 (view source) rosettacode>Paddy3118 (→‎Task clarification: correct behaviour with duplicates in M and/or N?: Explained?) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 13:30, 21 November 2020 (view source) M2000 (talk \| contribs) No edit summary
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 70: :The second cat in M is never indexed by an item in N. <br> :There is only one cat in N which matches the first cat in M. mat matches the last item in M so only the first and last items in M ''could'' be rearranged by their order in N. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118\|talk]]) 11:08, 13 October 2014 (UTC) ::Thanks Paddy3118, I still can’t get my head around the language, but you’re saying that items in N are taken from M without replacement, then the corresponding positions in M' are taken by successive items from N? --[[User:Jnd\|Jnd]] ([[User talk:Jnd\|talk]]) 11:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC) == Mathematica has fault == Mathematica has fault in A B C A B D A B E order by E A D A at the last letter, should be A and is E. Maybe is the copy of results, I didn't execute the code.