Talk:Optional parameters: Difference between revisions

(→‎Absence of arguments: l'esprit d'escalier…)
Line 36:
 
:::Some languages strongly distinguish, some don't. The fact that some do though means that it is worth describing on this site. On the other hand, the proposed name is far too close to this task's, so it's better to split this one so that it focusses on the optionality, and have [[Named Arguments|another one]] handle the naming. —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 08:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 
::::I'm not sure exactly what you propose splitting this task to; could you clarify?<br>I am concerned about creating too fine-grained distinctions: RC tasks should compare the approaches of different languages, and we should therefore avoid preferring tasks which are "Demonstrate this feature of your language if it has it". This task I specifically designed to be neutral about whether the language supports named parameters. --[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 11:13, 29 June 2009 (UTC)