Anonymous user
Talk:Number reversal game: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(→What Happens if the initial shuffle returns the list in sorted order?: The bug is easy to fix - why keep it?) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 17:
::::# You do know why but then have to defend leaving in the bug.
::::(P.S. Please sign your talk page entries, thanks) --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 02:51, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
::::: I am not here objecting to the problem stipulation: I'm saying the text of the messages flagging versions as incorrect is unclear and misleading. I offered a suggestion for changing that text. If the problem is that an implementation is allowing an already sorted shuffle, then the message should clearly say so. -- Randy Hudson 2010-08-02
So the issue is that problem statement calls for presenting an initial list that is definitely not in sorted order, and implementations should check for that. (I'm spelling it out because the above discussion doesn't, quite.)
| |||