Anonymous user
Talk:Non-continuous subsequences: Difference between revisions
→Suggestions for improvement
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 16:
: Looks good. I understood the "beside first and last element" incorrectly, my fault. If you don't mind, I've changed the wording of your explanation in the example a bit. --[[User:Dirkt|Dirkt]] 07:31, 29 March 2008 (MDT)
::Of course not mind -- [[User:Badmadevil|badmadevil]] 09:04, 29 March 2008 (MDT)
==Suggestions for improvement==
After [http://blog.rosettacode.org/?p=186 this post] in the RC blog, I ended up here and thought the page could be improved if references to algorithms attempted where added to the tail of the task description and implementations referred to which they were following. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 06:08, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
| |||