Talk:Narcissistic decimal number: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Talk:Narcissistic decimal number (view source)

Revision as of 18:20, 26 October 2020

518 bytes added , 3 years ago

"Functional" AppleScript solution still returning wrong result.

Nig

557

edits

Revision as of 07:45, 8 March 2014 (view source) rosettacode>Paddy3118 (New re-directs.) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 18:20, 26 October 2020 (view source) Nig (talk \| contribs) ("Functional" AppleScript solution still returning wrong result.)
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 31: ::I've aligned the verbiage in the first paragraph with the consensus view. --[[User:TimToady\|TimToady]] ([[User talk:TimToady\|talk]]) 21:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC) :::: My main concern was the use of ''a positive number'''   (or number).   That has been corrected.   As far as the other names, people searching for an algorithm for Armstrong numbers (or the other names) would now be able to find it easier. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger\|talk]]) 21:35, 7 March 2014 (UTC) :Added three new Re-directs for alternative names mentioned above. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118\|talk]]) 07:45, 8 March 2014 (UTC) Line 141: </pre> -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger\|talk]]) 02:50, 8 March 2014 (UTC) :Well, apart from the little matter of zero, your table matches the one on [http://oeis.org/A005188/b005188.txt OEIS]. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118\|talk]]) 08:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC) ==AppleScript: "Functional" solution== Hi Hout. You were so busy blaming the language you chose to demonstrate for the problems with your code that you forgot to uncomment the line which at least makes it return 25 numbers. :) --[[User:Nig\|Nig]] ([[User talk:Nig\|talk]]) 18:20, 26 October 2020 (UTC)