Anonymous user
Talk:Modular arithmetic: Difference between revisions
m
Mark who did the contribution
m (moved Talk:Modular Arithmetic to Talk:Modular arithmetic: capitalization policy) |
m (Mark who did the contribution) |
||
Line 3:
The purpose of this task is to show, if your programming language allows it,
how to redefine operators so that they can be used transparently on modular
</pre>
This is a nice interesting task description - although it would be much more interesting
Line 19:
This will make functional solutions to this task look longer than object oriented languages.
I therefore suggest that
using existing libraries.
<div><small>''(This was written by [[User:Soegaard|Soegaard]] ([[User_talk:Soegaard|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Soegaard|contribs]]) at 21:22, 11 March 2013)''</small></div>
:Even using a library is not without interest imho, as it shows the reader how the library is named and how it is used. For instance, it's not so easy to find out the name 'Mod::Int' when you never heard of it.
| |||