Talk:McNuggets problem: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Python: "composing generic abstractions": Whoops?) |
(→Python: "composing generic abstractions": Re-worded.) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
: paddy Well, I suppose one 'use' is that it does have a style. The examples now under REPL import functional idioms from itertools and abuse them in some sort of style chimera. Somewhere in this discussion you complained about the use of functional idioms rather than the pythonic Comprehensions. These were introduced in Python2 and the What's New in Python2 documentation explains in length how to map one to the other. Why then when I write a solution importing nothing and using only Comprehensions do you denigrate it as 'From F#'. Surley this is the Pythonic Solution--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 14:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC) |
: paddy Well, I suppose one 'use' is that it does have a style. The examples now under REPL import functional idioms from itertools and abuse them in some sort of style chimera. Somewhere in this discussion you complained about the use of functional idioms rather than the pythonic Comprehensions. These were introduced in Python2 and the What's New in Python2 documentation explains in length how to map one to the other. Why then when I write a solution importing nothing and using only Comprehensions do you denigrate it as 'From F#'. Surley this is the Pythonic Solution--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 14:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC) |
||
:: Hi Nigel; |
:: Hi Nigel; according to the page history [http://rosettacode.org/mw/index.php?title=McNuggets_Problem&type=revision&diff=271712&oldid=271667 You have "denigrated" your own example]! Please check. [[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 14:48, 29 October 2018 (UTC) |
||