Anonymous user
Talk:Matrix-exponentiation operator: Difference between revisions
Talk:Matrix-exponentiation operator (view source)
Revision as of 21:18, 28 February 2013
, 11 years ago→Descriptions and solutions don't match: new section
(→Descriptions and solutions don't match: new section) |
|||
Line 8:
:::Well, negative integer exponents at least will work for any ring, they don't require any algebraically closed field like the complex numbers. But of course then the operation is partial. And it's not my task, I don't know what the focus actually "is" -- the description leaves this open. However, I think the most important criterion to decide this is "what variant does tell us the most about the differences between languages?" --[[User:Dirkt|Dirkt]] 06:22, 5 June 2008 (MDT)
== Descriptions and solutions don't match ==
The task description first states that many languages have a matrix exponentiation operator.
Then it asks for an implementation of such an operation as an operator.
Most solutions don't show how to implement the operation as an operator
They simply show how to use a builtin operation.
Should the task description be rewritten to match the solutions?
| |||