Talk:Loops/Continue: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
mNo edit summary |
(→Shouldn't this made more explicit?: new section) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Er, whoops, meant to write RETURN, fixed now :P --[[User:Mbishop|Mbishop]] 21:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC) |
Er, whoops, meant to write RETURN, fixed now :P --[[User:Mbishop|Mbishop]] 21:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Shouldn't this made more explicit? == |
|||
The task asks just for an output, does not force nor suggest how to achieve it. Yes, one can take a look at written example, but if all we need is to compliant to task requirements, than the Loop/Continue feature could be missed! Shouldn't the task contain a sentence like "forcing the next iteration within the loop"? So I've done it (I'm feeling bold in modifying the wiki today:D) --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 11:54, 27 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:54, 27 April 2009
Modula-3
Was the Modula-3 example supposed to have the word "RAISE" in it somewhere? --Mwn3d 20:54, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Er, whoops, meant to write RETURN, fixed now :P --Mbishop 21:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Shouldn't this made more explicit?
The task asks just for an output, does not force nor suggest how to achieve it. Yes, one can take a look at written example, but if all we need is to compliant to task requirements, than the Loop/Continue feature could be missed! Shouldn't the task contain a sentence like "forcing the next iteration within the loop"? So I've done it (I'm feeling bold in modifying the wiki today:D) --ShinTakezou 11:54, 27 April 2009 (UTC)