Anonymous user
Talk:Long literals, with continuations: Difference between revisions
Talk:Long literals, with continuations (view source)
Revision as of 15:57, 25 March 2020
, 4 years agomoved my comment so as to be replying to a query after my query was moved to the wrong place.
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) m (→Enforcing imaginary rules: Move reply out of the middle of my comments) |
(moved my comment so as to be replying to a query after my query was moved to the wrong place.) |
||
Line 39:
:: If you really want the task to be about a comparison of how different programming languages handle literal data '''then why isn't that the task?''' See [[Quoting constructs]] for what the task ''could'' have been. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 14:46, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
::: Your comments about pointless and irrelevant constraints isn't germane to the task's description and/or requirements. Adding code to make the task less boring just makes it harder to compare computer programming languages (in regards to how other entries solve the task at hand. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 15:24, 25 March 2020 (UTC) ▼
::: Because I choose to have the task to be about how (different) computer programming languages handle (or specify, define, express) long literals with continuations. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 15:24, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
▲::: Your comments about pointless and irrelevant constraints isn't germane to the task's description and/or requirements. Adding code to make the task less boring just makes it harder to compare computer programming languages (in regards to how other entries solve the task at hand. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 15:24, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
| |||