Talk:Idiomatically determine all the characters that can be used for symbols: Difference between revisions

→‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): What is the REXX section for? LANGUAGE or IMPLEMENTATION?
(→‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): What is the REXX section for? LANGUAGE or IMPLEMENTATION?)
Line 27:
 
::::: If you want to show how ooRexx executes a REXX program, enter it in the ooRexx language section.   This is the issue, not that the program can be executed (or not) with Classic REXX.   The venue for ooRexx is in the ooRexx language section. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 19:12, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 
:::::: The venue for REXX programs is the REXX section. I don't think that duplicating REXX programs under ooRexx makes sense. The ooRexx section is the place to show (off) oo features where possible. The sections address LANGUAGES not IMPLEMENTATIONS.--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 19:19, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 
-----
2,289

edits