Talk:Idiomatically determine all the characters that can be used for symbols: Revision history

18 February 2018

• curprev 07:4907:49, 18 February 2018‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 77,145 bytes 0‎ →‎Arbitration?: corrected an HTML tag (was misspelling).

18 September 2017

• curprev 16:2316:23, 18 September 2017‎ PureFox talk contribs‎ 77,145 bytes +464‎ Added section about this page not displaying properly

19 September 2014

• curprev 06:4406:44, 19 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ m 76,681 bytes −3‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): Quote hassle
• curprev 06:4106:41, 19 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 76,684 bytes +296‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): asteism is indeed the correct word. I was misled by Google
• curprev 06:2106:21, 19 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ m 76,388 bytes +194‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): asterism

18 September 2014

• curprev 19:0919:09, 18 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 76,194 bytes +533‎ →‎Arbitration?: GIYF and asteisms.
• curprev 18:5518:55, 18 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 75,661 bytes +3,375‎ →‎Vote: Walter 1, Gerard 0: comment crusades.
• curprev 18:2918:29, 18 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 72,286 bytes +808‎ →‎Arbitration?: peace please!
• curprev 17:5417:54, 18 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 71,478 bytes +925‎ →‎Arbitration?: left-handed compliment comment.
• curprev 17:2217:22, 18 September 2014‎ Rvjansen talk contribs‎ 70,553 bytes +1,984‎ →‎Vote: Walter 1, Gerard 0: new section
• curprev 17:2017:20, 18 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 68,569 bytes +416‎ →‎Arbitration?: an example for constructive action instead of the current infight.
• curprev 17:0117:01, 18 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ m 68,153 bytes +5‎ →‎Arbitration?: add TRL1 to the sost of specifications.
• curprev 16:5916:59, 18 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 68,148 bytes +600‎ →‎Arbitration?: Please define Classic Rexx
• curprev 14:4414:44, 18 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 67,548 bytes +4,317‎ →‎Arbitration?: about defining Classic REXX and other comments.
• curprev 07:3007:30, 18 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 63,231 bytes +1,112‎ →‎Arbitration?: Classic REXX Interpreter is an undefinable notion!

17 September 2014

• curprev 22:4822:48, 17 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 62,119 bytes +623‎ →‎Arbitration?: answered the "or what" question.
• curprev 22:4322:43, 17 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ m 61,496 bytes +1‎ →‎Arbitration?: typo
• curprev 22:3822:38, 17 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 61,495 bytes +345‎ →‎Arbitration?: WHAT should be decided in lieu of voted?
• curprev 21:3421:34, 17 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 61,150 bytes +292‎ →‎Arbitration?: added a P.S.
• curprev 21:3021:30, 17 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 60,858 bytes +9,899‎ →‎Arbitration?: added invitational comments.
• curprev 18:2218:22, 17 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 50,959 bytes +1‎ →‎Arbitration?: corrected a MAJOR error in my 48 words and still waiting for the first vote :-(
• curprev 09:2409:24, 17 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 50,958 bytes +400‎ →‎Arbitration?: 48 words
• curprev 08:3408:34, 17 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 50,558 bytes +6‎ →‎Arbitration?: Emphasis.
• curprev 08:1108:11, 17 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ m 50,552 bytes +3‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): typo and formatting
• curprev 08:0608:06, 17 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 50,549 bytes +523‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): I consider Version 2 better than Version 1
• curprev 07:5507:55, 17 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ m 50,026 bytes +34‎ →‎Arbitration?: typo
• curprev 07:5307:53, 17 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 49,992 bytes +1,775‎ →‎Arbitration?: please tell me if and where I am wrong
• curprev 01:4601:46, 17 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 48,217 bytes +760‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added a comment about o-o languages.

16 September 2014

• curprev 22:5722:57, 16 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 47,457 bytes +214‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): Arbitration?

15 September 2014

• curprev 23:4423:44, 15 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 47,243 bytes +675‎ →‎entering ooRexx entries in wrong language section: answered another query.
• curprev 23:2023:20, 15 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 46,568 bytes +546‎ →‎entering ooRexx entries in wrong language section: WHAT is an ooRexx language entry?
• curprev 23:1123:11, 15 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 46,022 bytes +514‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): 2 more answers
• curprev 22:0322:03, 15 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 45,508 bytes +22‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): "does", "do" ... replaced a word.
• curprev 21:4921:49, 15 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 45,486 bytes +544‎ →‎entering ooRexx entries in wrong language section: answering an obvious query.
• curprev 21:3921:39, 15 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 44,942 bytes +834‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added comments for clarification.
• curprev 19:3219:32, 15 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 44,108 bytes +1,224‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): explain few and perfect
• curprev 19:2419:24, 15 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 42,884 bytes +214‎ →‎entering ooRexx entries in wrong language section: which?

14 September 2014

• curprev 21:3021:30, 14 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ 42,670 bytes +9,146‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added comments about not accepting false facts consistently.
• curprev 06:2106:21, 14 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 33,524 bytes +1,062‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): what should go into the REXX language section?!

13 September 2014

• curprev 22:0222:02, 13 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 32,462 bytes +495‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): explaining idiom.
• curprev 20:5720:57, 13 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 31,967 bytes +1,539‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): results for Classic REXX interpretors.
• curprev 20:0720:07, 13 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ m 30,428 bytes −1‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): formatting and typo
• curprev 20:0520:05, 13 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 30,429 bytes +588‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): retort to retort to ...
• curprev 19:3319:33, 13 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ 29,841 bytes +909‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added a rebuttal.
• curprev 19:1919:19, 13 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 28,932 bytes +352‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): What is the REXX section for? LANGUAGE or IMPLEMENTATION?
• curprev 19:1319:13, 13 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ m 28,580 bytes −1‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): for,atting
• curprev 19:1219:12, 13 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 28,581 bytes +382‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added another comment.
• curprev 19:0819:08, 13 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ 28,199 bytes +1,598‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added a new talk section.
• curprev 19:0519:05, 13 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 26,601 bytes +293‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): I understood what you did bit don' agree.
• curprev 18:5418:54, 13 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 26,308 bytes +284‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added a comment.
• curprev 18:4818:48, 13 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 26,024 bytes +234‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): I reinstated my program where it belongs.
• curprev 08:4308:43, 13 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 25,790 bytes +1,348‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added comments about CAPTCHA. pah-toey!
• curprev 08:2308:23, 13 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ 24,442 bytes +9,514‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): answered numerous questions.
• curprev 06:0406:04, 13 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ m 14,928 bytes +118‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): formatting & typos
• curprev 05:5805:58, 13 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 14,810 bytes +891‎ /* ooRexx is an Interpreter of REXX: continue the never ending discussion
• curprev 00:5700:57, 13 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ 13,919 bytes +352‎ →‎What do you mean by "symbol"?: added some humor.
• curprev 00:4800:48, 13 September 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ 13,567 bytes +7,201‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added comments about ooRexx programs being placed somwhere not in the ooRexx language section.

12 September 2014

• curprev 19:5719:57, 12 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 6,366 bytes +1‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): typo
• curprev 19:5619:56, 12 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 6,365 bytes +174‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): pls remove redundant version from ooRexx
• curprev 19:5219:52, 12 September 2014‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 6,191 bytes +622‎ →‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): new section

21 March 2014

• curprev 23:0723:07, 21 March 2014‎ rosettacode>TimToady‎ 5,569 bytes +132‎ →‎What do you mean by "symbol"?: much better
• curprev 20:4220:42, 21 March 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ 5,437 bytes +645‎ →‎What do you mean by "symbol"?: added a general description of ''symbols'' to the task's requirements.
• curprev 18:3918:39, 21 March 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ 4,792 bytes +485‎ →‎What do you mean by "symbol"?: commonality of definition(s).
• curprev 18:2918:29, 21 March 2014‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ 4,307 bytes +2,883‎ →‎What do you mean by "symbol"?: An attempt to explain via example and verbage.
• curprev 17:1417:14, 21 March 2014‎ rosettacode>TimToady‎ 1,424 bytes +1,424‎ symbol, shmymbol