Talk:Go Fish: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(→‎split this page?: new section)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== A strange game ==

Damn! The Tcl player keeps trouncing me... –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 23:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Damn! The Tcl player keeps trouncing me... –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 23:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
:If you put it against itself and it tells you "the only winning move is not to play" then you should be scared. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 00:05, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
:If you put it against itself and it tells you "the only winning move is not to play" then you should be scared. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 00:05, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Line 6: Line 8:


Every solution is quite long. Should this page be split like [[RCRPG]]? --[[User:Glennj|glennj]] 19:17, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Every solution is quite long. Should this page be split like [[RCRPG]]? --[[User:Glennj|glennj]] 19:17, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
:Probably. When I was making this task, I thought of doing that and then, for no good reason, didn't. —[[User:Underscore|Underscore]] ([[User talk:Underscore|Talk]]) 23:39, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:39, 17 December 2009

A strange game

Damn! The Tcl player keeps trouncing me... –Donal Fellows 23:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

If you put it against itself and it tells you "the only winning move is not to play" then you should be scared. --Mwn3d 00:05, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
No, be scared if it tries to guess launch codes. (I gotta go play me some DEFCON now...) -- Eriksiers 00:31, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

split this page?

Every solution is quite long. Should this page be split like RCRPG? --glennj 19:17, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Probably. When I was making this task, I thought of doing that and then, for no good reason, didn't. —Underscore (Talk) 23:39, 17 December 2009 (UTC)