Talk:Function definition: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
m (→‎Lisp, BASIC: I just noted that I had forgotten to sign my previous entry; fixed that)
Line 27: Line 27:
20 PRINT FN f(2,3)
20 PRINT FN f(2,3)


The QuickBasic language used in the example was already quite far away from the original BASIC language (no line numbers, true functions, named types, user-defined types).
The QuickBasic language used in the example was already quite far away from the original BASIC language (no line numbers, true functions, named types, user-defined types). --[[User:Ce|Ce]] 12:56, 1 March 2008 (MST)


* I disagree about Lisp, for the same kind of reason you consider BASIC not a single language, but it's not worth arguing over. I won't object if you readd the "Lisp" example. --[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 14:44, 1 March 2008 (MST)
* I disagree about Lisp, for the same kind of reason you consider BASIC not a single language, but it's not worth arguing over. I won't object if you readd the "Lisp" example. --[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 14:44, 1 March 2008 (MST)