Talk:Function definition: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 19:56, 1 March 2008 (view source) Ce (talk \| contribs) (New section: Lisp, BASIC) ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:44, 1 March 2008 (view source) rosettacode>Kevin Reid (reply re Lisp) Newer edit →
Line 28:		Line 28:

	The QuickBasic language used in the example was already quite far away from the original BASIC language (no line numbers, true functions, named types, user-defined types).		The QuickBasic language used in the example was already quite far away from the original BASIC language (no line numbers, true functions, named types, user-defined types).

			* I disagree about Lisp, for the same kind of reason you consider BASIC not a single language, but it's not worth arguing over. I won't object if you readd the "Lisp" example. --[[User:Kevin Reid\|Kevin Reid]] 14:44, 1 March 2008 (MST)