Talk:First-class functions/Use numbers analogously: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It seems redundant to duplicate the [[First-class functions]] code here. --[[User:Glennj|glennj]] 17:37, 7 August 2009 (UTC) |
It seems redundant to duplicate the [[First-class functions]] code here. --[[User:Glennj|glennj]] 17:37, 7 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Maybe, but it depends on how you want to make your comparison. I note that some have just put a link to FcF; it would be nice to make their own comments too, as i would like the page to show a comparison rather than leave the comparison ''wholly'' to the reader. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 18:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC) |
:Maybe, but it depends on how you want to make your comparison. I note that some have just put a link to FcF; it would be nice to make their own comments too, as i would like the page to show a comparison rather than leave the comparison ''wholly'' to the reader. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 18:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
::Fair enough --[[User:Glennj|glennj]] 19:13, 7 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:13, 7 August 2009
It seems redundant to duplicate the First-class functions code here. --glennj 17:37, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe, but it depends on how you want to make your comparison. I note that some have just put a link to FcF; it would be nice to make their own comments too, as i would like the page to show a comparison rather than leave the comparison wholly to the reader. --Paddy3118 18:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough --glennj 19:13, 7 August 2009 (UTC)