Talk:Factorial: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (indent my older comments. -- ~~~~) |
(→D output: added query. -- ~~~~) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
I think it is better to use generic x86, and at most to specify a "works with", if needed, rather than let proliferate 80286, 80386, 80486, ... —[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 14:56, 27 April 2010 (UTC) |
I think it is better to use generic x86, and at most to specify a "works with", if needed, rather than let proliferate 80286, 80386, 80486, ... —[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 14:56, 27 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
: I agree to a point; there's a definite progression and tendency toward backwards-compatibility. However, there are incompatible revisions. It's possible that different modes (real, protected, long and legacy) warrant some degree of recognition as their own languages--these modes represent forward and reverse compatibility constraints. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 16:03, 27 April 2010 (UTC) |
: I agree to a point; there's a definite progression and tendency toward backwards-compatibility. However, there are incompatible revisions. It's possible that different modes (real, protected, long and legacy) warrant some degree of recognition as their own languages--these modes represent forward and reverse compatibility constraints. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 16:03, 27 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
==D output== |
|||
Is the '''D''' output supposed to show (eight times) the value of ('''15!''') ? -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 19:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||