Talk:Execute Brain****/BASIC/QuickBasic: Difference between revisions
Talk:Execute Brain****/BASIC/QuickBasic (view source)
Revision as of 02:24, 11 April 2008
, 16 years agoSounds good.
No edit summary |
(Sounds good.) |
||
Line 3:
WARNING!!! It uses a lot of pointer arthimetic and is not secure, i.e. "<+" is all the code needed to overflow since there's no bounds checking.
:If you have another BF interpreter for a BASIC language, I'm not sure how we should do it. This one should maybe move to RCBF/QuickBASIC? We need a little discussion on this. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 12:13, 4 April 2008 (MDT)
::Works for me. The BASIC/QBASIC/QuickBASIC/FreeBASIC/AppleSoft BASIC/etc. ambiguity of the basic nature of the BASIC examples on RC give me a headache. Basically, I'd like to see some basic separation and distinction. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 20:24, 10 April 2008 (MDT)
| |||