Talk:Evaluate binomial coefficients: Difference between revisions
Talk:Evaluate binomial coefficients (view source)
Revision as of 15:23, 24 February 2019
, 5 years agoAllow yourself the luxury of an opinion. Good luck !
(Allow yourself the luxury of an opinion. Good luck !) |
|||
Line 75:
:: I read your diatribe, and have noted my issues several times, above.<br> Your summary is misleading, (but our actions on the page seem to be converging). --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 09:44, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
::: We disagree, and that's fine - I have never deleted or interfered with your code, and I'm sure we can converge on an agreement that you don't continue to delete or interfere with mine, which is optimised for a different set of goals, and constructed and commented in a different way.
::: It must be difficult, and perhaps unexpected, to have Nigel and I reflecting back to you that your behaviour constitutes harassment and bullying, and I'm sure you would wish to avoid any repetitions.
::: A first step to helping yourself avoid this kind of behaviour might simply be to allow yourself the luxury of having an opinion, rather depersonalising your pronouncements and taking seeking refuge behind imagined tablets of stone.
::: There is no need to replace a braver and more honest statement like 'I disagree with your summary' with a detached and unsupported olympian claim like 'your summary is misleading'.
::: Similarly, allow yourself to notice that your detached and impersonal expression 'hence the deletions' really means "so '''I''' deleted '''your''' work" – a real interaction between two real people.
::: If you can move away from depersonalising yourself, you will be in less danger of depersonalising others, and slipping back into unwitting bullying and harassment.
::: Give yourself a break. Allow yourself to have an opinion. There's no need to represent it as dissociated impersonal fact,
::: and there's no need to feel frightened of others having opinions too.
::: I'll compose code from pure functions, and annotate in a way that facilitates insight and Rosetta comparison, and you can write the kind of code that you prefer, and that has the qualities which you prefer to pursue.
::: Good luck ! [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 15:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
==A Foolish Consistency is the Hobgoblin of Little Minds==
| |||