Talk:Elementary cellular automaton/Random number generator: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::100 (as used in Perl),and also 10. I think it may be down to me using fixed '0' boundaries but this is allowed in the Eca task? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 14:04, 21 March 2014 (UTC) |
::100 (as used in Perl),and also 10. I think it may be down to me using fixed '0' boundaries but this is allowed in the Eca task? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 14:04, 21 March 2014 (UTC) |
||
:::If you can confirm that with fixed boundary states, all ECA converge towards a finite state of "all 1" for any array size, then indeed it might be better to enforce warping arrays.--[[User:Grondilu|Grondilu]] ([[User talk:Grondilu|talk]]) 20:04, 21 March 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:04, 21 March 2014
Endianness or MSB/LSB difference?
The description urges "little endian" (byte order in longer integer types), but was really talking about arranging bits in a byte. Misnomer? --Ledrug (talk) 18:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- It seems so. My bad. Is "with the least significant bit at the end" correct?--Grondilu (talk) 09:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Probably needs more restrictions
Rule 30 with fixed '0' ends just goes to '1' in all cells after a while. --Paddy3118 (talk) 06:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)