Talk:Elementary cellular automaton/Random number generator: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Probably needs more restrictions: Thanks!) |
|||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:::I did wrap them, as I found it much easier to implement. I will narrow the requirement in the parent task.--[[User:Grondilu|Grondilu]] ([[User talk:Grondilu|talk]]) 02:24, 22 March 2014 (UTC) |
:::I did wrap them, as I found it much easier to implement. I will narrow the requirement in the parent task.--[[User:Grondilu|Grondilu]] ([[User talk:Grondilu|talk]]) 02:24, 22 March 2014 (UTC) |
||
::::Thanks Grondilu :-) <br> --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 07:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:34, 22 March 2014
Endianness or MSB/LSB difference?
The description urges "little endian" (byte order in longer integer types), but was really talking about arranging bits in a byte. Misnomer? --Ledrug (talk) 18:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- It seems so. My bad. Is "with the least significant bit at the end" correct?--Grondilu (talk) 09:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Probably needs more restrictions
Rule 30 with fixed '0' ends just goes to '1' in all cells after a while. --Paddy3118 (talk) 06:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- I can confirm that for 100 and 10 it does go to 1's for column that starts with a 1 in it doing Rule 30. Seems to me that you can't do Elementary cellular automaton and this task without making the former more specidic? What did you do with boundaries for your solution that works? --Paddy3118 (talk) 23:26, 21 March 2014 (UTC)