Talk:Eban numbers: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (What optimizations am I missing?) |
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) m (→Optimizations?: Don't repeat myself) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
This will allow optimizations to be used.</blockquote> |
This will allow optimizations to be used.</blockquote> |
||
I am mildly curious as to what optimizations this refers to. Maybe I am missing something, but I am failing to how limiting to one sextillion offers any way to optimize. Not so big a deal for the Perl 6 example as it counts the *-ban numbers up to one sextillion 3 times in less than a second (on my system). I just wonder |
I am mildly curious as to what optimizations this refers to. Maybe I am missing something, but I am failing to how limiting to one sextillion offers any way to optimize. Not so big a deal for the Perl 6 example as it counts the *-ban numbers up to one sextillion 3 times in less than a second (on my system). I just wonder what I am overlooking. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 21:06, 22 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 21:17, 22 March 2019
Optimizations?
From the task description:
Only numbers less than one sextillion 1021 will be considered in/for this task.
This will allow optimizations to be used.
I am mildly curious as to what optimizations this refers to. Maybe I am missing something, but I am failing to how limiting to one sextillion offers any way to optimize. Not so big a deal for the Perl 6 example as it counts the *-ban numbers up to one sextillion 3 times in less than a second (on my system). I just wonder what I am overlooking. --Thundergnat (talk) 21:06, 22 March 2019 (UTC)