Talk:Deepcopy: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 4:
:: Reasonable. If the library is written in the language, it might be appropriate to demonstrate the mechanisms and principles on which it operates, rather than providing a fully-functional example. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 14:10, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
: As a general rule, I think it is better not to specify in such detail, and let the example authors document their examples as they see fit. (Or perhaps for this case, “Explain how the deep copy works, such as by showing its source.” — make it into another point-that-must-be-covered.) —[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 14:10, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 
Try#1
: Original text: "This can be via a built-in procedure or operator, a function from a common library (provide reference and source if it is written in the language), or a procedure (show source)."
: Updated text: This can be via a built-in procedure or operator, a function from a common library (provide reference/link), or a procedure written in the language itself.
:* If this is written in the language, describe or show how this works (possibly by including source if copyrights allow or by other means).
Anonymous user