Talk:Decision tables: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(“Condition alternatives” missing?) |
(response) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
How much of the decision table should we model? In particular, the “condition alternatives” quadrant has been omitted from both current examples, as both are using “complete” alternative tables in their model, but surely it would be better to have that data anyway? If nothing else, it would possibly permit a more compact representation when using larger numbers of questions... –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 12:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC) |
How much of the decision table should we model? In particular, the “condition alternatives” quadrant has been omitted from both current examples, as both are using “complete” alternative tables in their model, but surely it would be better to have that data anyway? If nothing else, it would possibly permit a more compact representation when using larger numbers of questions... –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 12:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
:Good point. Protium does the condition alternatives part -- I'll get to an example real soon now. ---[[User:Axtens|Axtens]] |
|||
Revision as of 14:58, 25 January 2011
How much of the decision table should we model? In particular, the “condition alternatives” quadrant has been omitted from both current examples, as both are using “complete” alternative tables in their model, but surely it would be better to have that data anyway? If nothing else, it would possibly permit a more compact representation when using larger numbers of questions... –Donal Fellows 12:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- Good point. Protium does the condition alternatives part -- I'll get to an example real soon now. ---Axtens