Talk:Cullen and Woodall numbers: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
(Undo revision 351801 by Nigel Galloway (talk))
Line 1: Line 1:
First observation: n must be odd because 2<sup>n</sup> is always even and primes rarely are.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 16:31, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
First observation: n must be odd because 2<sup>n is always even and primes rarely are.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 16:31, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:37, 13 January 2022

First observation: n must be odd because 2n is always even and primes rarely are.--Nigel Galloway (talk) 16:31, 13 January 2022 (UTC)