Talk:Cuban primes: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) m (phooey) |
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) m (→Why so large?: add missing signature for first comment (retrieved from history)) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Why so large? == |
== Why so large? == |
||
I don't know why to choose such a big number "show the 100,000th cuban prime." |
I don't know why to choose such a big number "show the 100,000th cuban prime." |
||
It take me above 2min runtime. the 6635th cuban prime 4293894169 is the last < 2^32. |
It take me above 2min runtime. the 6635th cuban prime 4293894169 is the last < 2^32. --[[User:Horst.h|Horst.h]] ([[User talk:Horst.h|talk]]) 11:33, 1 February 2019 (UTC) |
||
:My theory is that Gerard lives in the upper midwest of the US and is trying to heat his house with his processor. 🤔 --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 13:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC) |
:My theory is that Gerard lives in the upper midwest of the US and is trying to heat his house with his processor. 🤔 --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 13:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:43, 1 February 2019
Why so large?
I don't know why to choose such a big number "show the 100,000th cuban prime." It take me above 2min runtime. the 6635th cuban prime 4293894169 is the last < 2^32. --Horst.h (talk) 11:33, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- My theory is that Gerard lives in the upper midwest of the US and is trying to heat his house with his processor. 🤔 --Thundergnat (talk) 13:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- That specific number was the only cuban prime of any substance that could be verified as being correct. If anyone had a reputable web page that has a reference to a smaller number, I would've used that instead. So Thundergnat's theory falls flat. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 14:10, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Darn! :-) --Thundergnat (talk) 14:37, 1 February 2019 (UTC)