Talk:Cuban primes: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Why the 10**5 cuban number was chosen..) |
m (→Why so large?: changed a "tense" word.) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:My theory is that Gerard lives in the upper midwest of the US and is trying to heat his house with his processor. 🤔 --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 13:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC) |
:My theory is that Gerard lives in the upper midwest of the US and is trying to heat his house with his processor. 🤔 --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 13:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC) |
||
:: That specific number was the only cuban prime of any substance that could be verified as being correct. If anyone |
:: That specific number was the only cuban prime of any substance that could be verified as being correct. If anyone had a reputable web page that has a reference to a smaller number, I would've used that instead. So Thundergnat's theory falls flat. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 14:10, 1 February 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:20, 1 February 2019
Why so large?
I don't know why to choose such a big number "show the 100,000th cuban prime." It take me above 2min runtime. the 6635th cuban prime 4293894169 is the last < 2^32.
- My theory is that Gerard lives in the upper midwest of the US and is trying to heat his house with his processor. 🤔 --Thundergnat (talk) 13:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- That specific number was the only cuban prime of any substance that could be verified as being correct. If anyone had a reputable web page that has a reference to a smaller number, I would've used that instead. So Thundergnat's theory falls flat. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 14:10, 1 February 2019 (UTC)