Talk:Cuban primes: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 14:13, 1 February 2019

Why so large?

I don't know why to choose such a big number "show the 100,000th cuban prime." It take me above 2min runtime. the 6635th cuban prime 4293894169 is the last < 2^32.

My theory is that Gerard lives in the upper midwest of the US and is trying to heat his house with his processor. 🤔 --Thundergnat (talk) 13:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

That specific number was the only cuban prime of any substance that could be verified as being correct. If anyone has a reputable web page that has a reference to a smaller number, I would've used that instead. So Thundergnat's theory falls flat. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 14:10, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:44, 1 February 2019 (view source) Thundergnat (talk \| contribs) (my thoery) ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:13, 1 February 2019 (view source) rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger (Why the 10**5 cuban number was chosen..) Newer edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:My theory is that Gerard lives in the upper midwest of the US and is trying to heat his house with his processor. 🤔 --[[User:Thundergnat\|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat\|talk]]) 13:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC)		:My theory is that Gerard lives in the upper midwest of the US and is trying to heat his house with his processor. 🤔 --[[User:Thundergnat\|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat\|talk]]) 13:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

			:: That specific number was the only cuban prime of any substance that could be verified as being correct.   If anyone has a reputable web page that has a reference to a smaller number, I would've used that instead.   So Thundergnat's theory falls flat.     -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger\|talk]]) 14:10, 1 February 2019 (UTC)