Talk:Continued fraction/Arithmetic/Construct from rational number: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Using r2cf as Generator a in Continued fraction: I'm happy to take suggestions) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:: From the links, I'd guess “rational to continued fraction”. I think this task needs some work on naming! “<tt>Continued fraction arithmetic/Construct from rational number</tt>” would be a first guess; opinions? –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC) |
:: From the links, I'd guess “rational to continued fraction”. I think this task needs some work on naming! “<tt>Continued fraction arithmetic/Construct from rational number</tt>” would be a first guess; opinions? –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
::: I would like Continue fraction arithmetic to be renamed “<tt>Arithmetic</tt>” as a child of “<tt>Continued fraction</tt>” so the final result would be “<tt>Continued fraction/Arithmetic/Construct from rational number</tt>”--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 12:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC) |
::: I would like Continue fraction arithmetic to be renamed “<tt>Arithmetic</tt>” as a child of “<tt>Continued fraction</tt>” so the final result would be “<tt>Continued fraction/Arithmetic/Construct from rational number</tt>”--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 12:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
:::: Not a problem at all. Won't move things until we've agreed exactly what we're going to though; too messy in terms of the redirects left behind… –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 14:27, 5 February 2013 (UTC) |
|||
: BTW, Nigel, please use the internal link style for links within Rosetta Code (and <tt>wp:</tt> links for links into english Wikipedia) as that makes for better SEO. It's a small thing, but it's better for this site. Cheers! –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 10:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC) |
: BTW, Nigel, please use the internal link style for links within Rosetta Code (and <tt>wp:</tt> links for links into english Wikipedia) as that makes for better SEO. It's a small thing, but it's better for this site. Cheers! –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 10:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 14:27, 5 February 2013
Using r2cf as Generator a in Continued fraction
Note that Continued fraction assumes Generators a and b are infinite. You may have to adjust Continued fraction to allow for r2cf terminating. The generator for sqrt2 may be used with r2cf.--Nigel Galloway 13:17, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry I may have missed something but what does r2cf stand for?--Grondilu 17:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- From the links, I'd guess “rational to continued fraction”. I think this task needs some work on naming! “Continued fraction arithmetic/Construct from rational number” would be a first guess; opinions? –Donal Fellows 09:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
- I would like Continue fraction arithmetic to be renamed “Arithmetic” as a child of “Continued fraction” so the final result would be “Continued fraction/Arithmetic/Construct from rational number”--Nigel Galloway 12:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
- Not a problem at all. Won't move things until we've agreed exactly what we're going to though; too messy in terms of the redirects left behind… –Donal Fellows 14:27, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
- I would like Continue fraction arithmetic to be renamed “Arithmetic” as a child of “Continued fraction” so the final result would be “Continued fraction/Arithmetic/Construct from rational number”--Nigel Galloway 12:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
- From the links, I'd guess “rational to continued fraction”. I think this task needs some work on naming! “Continued fraction arithmetic/Construct from rational number” would be a first guess; opinions? –Donal Fellows 09:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
- BTW, Nigel, please use the internal link style for links within Rosetta Code (and wp: links for links into english Wikipedia) as that makes for better SEO. It's a small thing, but it's better for this site. Cheers! –Donal Fellows 10:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
- IAWTC--Nigel Galloway 13:04, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Titles are messed up
All CF-related articles should be under a generic "Continued fraction/" section. For instance, this article should be: "Continued fraction/r2cf" or "Continued fraction/From a Rational"--Grondilu 13:20, 5 February 2013 (UTC)