Talk:Continued fraction/Arithmetic/Construct from rational number: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Using r2cf as Generator a in [http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Continued_fraction Continued fraction]==
==Using r2cf as Generator a in [[Continued fraction]]==
Note that [http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Continued_fraction Continued fraction] assumes Generators a and b are infinite. You may have to adjust [http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Continued_fraction Continued fraction] to allow for r2cf terminating. The generator for sqrt2 may be used with r2cf.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 13:17, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Note that [[Continued fraction]] assumes Generators a and b are infinite. You may have to adjust [[Continued fraction]] to allow for r2cf terminating. The generator for sqrt2 may be used with r2cf.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 13:17, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
:Sorry I may have missed something but what does r2cf stand for?--[[User:Grondilu|Grondilu]] 17:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
:Sorry I may have missed something but what does r2cf stand for?--[[User:Grondilu|Grondilu]] 17:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
:: From the links, I'd guess “rational to continued fraction”. I think this task needs some work on naming! “<tt>Continued fraction arithmetic/Construct from rational number</tt>” would be a first guess; opinions? –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
:: From the links, I'd guess “rational to continued fraction”. I think this task needs some work on naming! “<tt>Continued fraction arithmetic/Construct from rational number</tt>” would be a first guess; opinions? –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
::: I would like Continue fraction arithmetic to be renamed “<tt>Arithmetic</tt>” as a child of “<tt>Continued fraction</tt>” so the final result would be “<tt>Continued fraction/Arithmetic/Construct from rational number</tt>”--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 12:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)


: BTW, Nigel, please use the internal link style for links within Rosetta Code (and <tt>wp:</tt> links for links into english Wikipedia) as that makes for better SEO. It's a small thing, but it's better for this site. Cheers! –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 10:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
: BTW, Nigel, please use the internal link style for links within Rosetta Code (and <tt>wp:</tt> links for links into english Wikipedia) as that makes for better SEO. It's a small thing, but it's better for this site. Cheers! –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 10:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:56, 5 February 2013

Using r2cf as Generator a in Continued fraction

Note that Continued fraction assumes Generators a and b are infinite. You may have to adjust Continued fraction to allow for r2cf terminating. The generator for sqrt2 may be used with r2cf.--Nigel Galloway 13:17, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Sorry I may have missed something but what does r2cf stand for?--Grondilu 17:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
From the links, I'd guess “rational to continued fraction”. I think this task needs some work on naming! “Continued fraction arithmetic/Construct from rational number” would be a first guess; opinions? –Donal Fellows 09:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
I would like Continue fraction arithmetic to be renamed “Arithmetic” as a child of “Continued fraction” so the final result would be “Continued fraction/Arithmetic/Construct from rational number”--Nigel Galloway 12:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
BTW, Nigel, please use the internal link style for links within Rosetta Code (and wp: links for links into english Wikipedia) as that makes for better SEO. It's a small thing, but it's better for this site. Cheers! –Donal Fellows 10:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)