Talk:Compiler/syntax analyzer: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Question about unary operators) |
m ((forgot signature)) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
which would be more usual? |
which would be more usual? |
||
If I read it correctly, the C reference implementation does treat unary operators as highest precedence. |
If I read it correctly, the C reference implementation does treat unary operators as highest precedence. |
||
--[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 08:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:46, 23 October 2016
Unary operator precedence
In the grmmmar, the definition of primary is:
primary = Identifier | Integer | '(' expr ')' | ('+' | '-' | '!') expr ;
which makes the unary operators the lowest precedence? Should that be:
primary = Identifier | Integer | '(' expr ')' | ('+' | '-' | '!') primary ;
which would be more usual? If I read it correctly, the C reference implementation does treat unary operators as highest precedence. --Tigerofdarkness (talk) 08:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC)