Talk:Check Machin-like formulas: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (proper indenting) |
(→OCaml: Very long line: Ta.) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Could the OCaml be changed to indicate equality with one as a short true/false indicator rather than printing out the very long line? Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 21:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC) |
Could the OCaml be changed to indicate equality with one as a short true/false indicator rather than printing out the very long line? Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 21:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC) |
||
:: OK, I have changed the Ocaml program so the output is shorter [[User:TobyK|TobyK]] 22:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC) |
:: OK, I have changed the Ocaml program so the output is shorter [[User:TobyK|TobyK]] 22:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC) |
||
:::(... And thanks for the task Toby. I enjoyed it :-)<br>--[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 06:05, 9 November 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:05, 9 November 2012
Aesthetics
The original equations without the math formatting have a lot going for them. What do you think? --Paddy3118 21:08, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- The text format can be used for data input (as in the Python example) and the formatted fractions are a bit crowded (small line spacing).
- There are some odd text sizes now, the last identity [tan(-a)=-tan(a)] is in a smaller fontwith Firefox 16.0.2, anyone else see this?
- If we can't improve the current layout I would prefer the original format. TobyK 22:22, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
OCaml: Very long line
Could the OCaml be changed to indicate equality with one as a short true/false indicator rather than printing out the very long line? Thanks. --Paddy3118 21:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC)