Talk:Check Machin-like formulas: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==OCaml: Very long line== |
==OCaml: Very long line== |
||
Could the OCaml be changed to indicate equality with one as a short true/false indicator rather than printing out the very long line? Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 21:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC) |
Could the OCaml be changed to indicate equality with one as a short true/false indicator rather than printing out the very long line? Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 21:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC) |
||
OK, I have |
OK, I have changed the Ocaml program so the output is shorter [[User:TobyK|TobyK]] 22:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 22:24, 8 November 2012
Aesthetics
The original equations without the math formatting have a lot going for them. What do you think? --Paddy3118 21:08, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
The text format can be used for data input (as in the Python example) and the formatted fractions are a bit crowded (small line spacing). There are some odd text sizes now, the last identity [tan(-a)=-tan(a)] is in a smaller font with Firefox 16.0.2, anyone else see this? If we can't improve the current layout I would prefer the original format. TobyK 22:22, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
OCaml: Very long line
Could the OCaml be changed to indicate equality with one as a short true/false indicator rather than printing out the very long line? Thanks. --Paddy3118 21:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
OK, I have changed the Ocaml program so the output is shorter TobyK 22:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC)