Talk:CRC-32: Difference between revisions

Talk:CRC-32 (view source)

8 bytes added , 10 years ago

m

→‎REXX: added a clarifying word; the sentence (before) seemed to be indeterminate. -- ~~~~

Anonymous user

Revision as of 20:45, 18 August 2013 (view source) rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger m (→‎REXX: explained where the code change was made (locally). -- ~~~~) ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:23, 18 August 2013 (view source) rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger m (→‎REXX: added a clarifying word; the sentence (before) seemed to be indeterminate. -- ~~~~) Newer edit →
Line 198: ----- Perhaps this discussion would be better served where there're more (varied) REXX experts (and REXX authors) hanging around --- [such as the REXX newsgroup, '''comp.lang.rexx''']. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger\|talk]]) 19:00, 18 August 2013 (UTC) :: the ticket raised by someone else should fit your request. Why can't you accept that Regina is wrong here (according to the standard? According to your tests it's the only Rexx that fails to obey the spec! BTW: I entered a doc ticket for ooRexx now because there is a wrong sentence in the C2D description. --[[User:Walterpachl\|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl\|talk]]) 19:27, 18 August 2013 (UTC)