Talk:CRC-32: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
(→‎REXX: it wasn't me :-))
(→‎REXX: reinstated my original statements. -- ~~~~)
Line 141: Line 141:
<br>A &nbsp; &nbsp; '''say 'digits=' digits()''' &nbsp; &nbsp; would be a nice addition.
<br>A &nbsp; &nbsp; '''say 'digits=' digits()''' &nbsp; &nbsp; would be a nice addition.
<br><br>But in any case &nbsp; (all were executed under a Windows/XP DOS window (cmd.exe):<br><br>
<br><br>But in any case &nbsp; (all were executed under a Windows/XP DOS window (cmd.exe):<br><br>
'''output''' from Regina:
'''output''' from Regina &nbsp; (including 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7):
<pre>
<pre>
REXX-Regina_3.7(MT) 5.00 14 Oct 2012
REXX-Regina_3.7(MT) 5.00 14 Oct 2012
Line 170: Line 170:
Statement context: D:\crud0.rex, procedure: badwalter
Statement context: D:\crud0.rex, procedure: badwalter
</pre>
</pre>
Clearly, different REXXes which are different are behaving differently. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 08:26, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Differentially, different REXXes which are different are behaving differently (or indifferently?). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 08:26, 18 August 2013 (UTC)


-----
-----
:: Thanks for testing. The 'test case' was not for any program. (I tested the Rexx compiler for VM and then TSO and used such a framework for all programs. Anyway, you see that not only ooRexx does follow the specs (Regina doesn't!?!) - the "obnoxious" statement is therefore not just for ooRexx. right? If you use primarily Regina you won't notice this "problem" right?? --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 08:54, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
:: Thanks for testing. The 'test case' was not for any program. (I tested the Rexx compiler for VM and then TSO and used such a framework for all programs. Anyway, you see that not only ooRexx does follow the specs (Regina doesn't!?!) - the "obnoxious" statement is therefore not just for ooRexx. right? If you use primarily Regina you won't notice this "problem" right?? --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 08:54, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

::: The word I used was ''innoxious'', not ''obnoxious''. &nbsp; Also, I believe it's considered bad form to change people's quotes (I don't mind the correcting of an obvious misspelling, but not the content) --- especially on the discussion (talk) page. &nbsp; The reason I had the various flavors of Regina listed was that some Regina versions were considering numbers as integers that may or may not be considered integers, &nbsp; i.e.: &nbsp; -.1e7 &nbsp; and &nbsp; 12345678912345 &nbsp; for instance. &nbsp; I don't know where Regina REXX currently stands on this. &nbsp; There was some discussion of this topic in the newsgroup '''comp.lang.rexx''' a few months (or maybe years) back; it had to do with what a user expected (REXX's principle of least astonishment) versus what the REXX standard stated &nbsp; (in both examples, both are clearly integers, but maybe not so much according to '''numeric digits'''.) &nbsp; I used the word ''integers'' instead of ''whole numbers'' 'cause some people where saying (in the newsgroup) that negative numbers weren't whole numbers, and some also stated that zero isn't a whole number. &nsp; Sheesh! &nbsp; ''Natural numbers'' and ''counting numbers'' were also thrown around rather loosely. &nbsp; It was a lively and animated discussion as I recall. &nbsp; Walter, if you're going to add your comments interspersed within my signed comments, please sign your inserted statements. &nbsp; It appears that I'm contradicting (my bullet points) with myself and it's not clear at all who is stating what. &nbsp; Also, now that the REXX program has changed drastically, my (REXX) output no longer matches anything posted, so the results are meaningless. &nbsp; That's what programming versions are for (version 1, my output; version 2, ...). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 18:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC)


::: So Regina would not have passed my test suite. Time to ask for Regina's POV (which I will do when I am back home) --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 09:09, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
::: So Regina would not have passed my test suite. Time to ask for Regina's POV (which I will do when I am back home) --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 09:09, 18 August 2013 (UTC)