Talk:CRC-32: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (→REXX: made an unclear comment more unclear; it's now clear as mud, but it covers the ground. -- ~~~~) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (thanks for testing) |
||
Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
<br>A '''say 'digits=' digits()''' would be a nice addition. |
<br>A '''say 'digits=' digits()''' would be a nice addition. |
||
<br><br>But in any case (all were executed under a Windows/XP DOS window (cmd.exe):<br><br> |
<br><br>But in any case (all were executed under a Windows/XP DOS window (cmd.exe):<br><br> |
||
'''output''' from Regina |
'''output''' from Regina: |
||
<pre> |
<pre> |
||
REXX-Regina_3.7(MT) 5.00 14 Oct 2012 |
REXX-Regina_3.7(MT) 5.00 14 Oct 2012 |
||
Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
Statement context: D:\crud0.rex, procedure: badwalter |
Statement context: D:\crud0.rex, procedure: badwalter |
||
</pre> |
</pre> |
||
Clearly, different REXXes which are different are behaving differently. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 08:26, 18 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
----- |
----- |
||
:: Thanks for testing. The 'test case' was not for any program. (I tested the Rexx compiler for VM and then TSO and used such a framework for all programs. Anyway, you see that not only ooRexx does follow the specs (Regina doesn't!?!) - the "obnoxious" statement is therefore not just for ooRexx. right? If you use primarily Regina you won't notice this "problem" right?? --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 08:54, 18 August 2013 (UTC) |