Talk:Brazilian numbers: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(added a section name to the first talk topic, this will also place the TOC correctly.) |
(Added a comment.) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
prints 4618--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 17:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC) |
prints 4618--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 17:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC) |
||
:OK I think I've found it--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 17:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC) |
:OK I think I've found it--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 17:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC) |
||
:: I also noticed the difference two days ago, and I assumed that my REXX version was incorrect and was trying to find what the problem was in my computer program; I was hoping somebody else would calculate the 100,000<sup>th</sup> Brazilian number and verify it (or not). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 19:23, 14 August 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:24, 14 August 2019
wee discrepancy
Is it possible to be a little more specific regarding the "wee discrepancy" with the F# version? <lang fsharp> printfn "%d" (Seq.item 3999 (Brazilian())) </lang> prints 4618--Nigel Galloway (talk) 17:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- OK I think I've found it--Nigel Galloway (talk) 17:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- I also noticed the difference two days ago, and I assumed that my REXX version was incorrect and was trying to find what the problem was in my computer program; I was hoping somebody else would calculate the 100,000th Brazilian number and verify it (or not). -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 19:23, 14 August 2019 (UTC)