Anonymous user
Talk:Box the compass: Difference between revisions
m
→Renaming of a programming language: elided the use of «code» to use highlighting.
(added a section header (renaming of a programming language). -- ~~~~) |
m (→Renaming of a programming language: elided the use of «code» to use highlighting.) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 95:
I must admit that I did not have this argument in full to handuntil now. I must also say though that I did note that the index wrapped and that it seemed right and proper to do so. (Wrapping angles so they end up in 0-360 degree range is commonplace for me, almost like a "normallization for angles", so seeing an index wrap when the direction wrapped rang no bells in my case). --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 04:57, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
==Renaming of a programming language
I hope I didn't break the rules. The (old) entry under '''REXX''' was instead, '''ooRexx'''.
This would be similar to someone entering a '''C++''' entry under '''C'''.
If this isn't acceptable, I would like the know what the procedure is, and should the original poster be told of this?
I didn't like to move an entire (big) programming entry like that, too many things could've gone wrong with my fat fingers and not-so-good eyesight. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 18:21, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
| |||