Talk:Averages/Pythagorean means: Difference between revisions
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==A >= G >= H missing?== |
==A >= G >= H missing?== |
||
It is like going back and fixing the question when you got the answer wrong ;-)<br> |
It is like going back and fixing the question when you got the answer wrong ;-)<br> |
||
On reading the wp article it seemed like a useful little fact about the Pythagorean means, (apart from the nifty little semi-circular diagram), that I want to have in the RC task. I think it should be re-instated and the examples fixed. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 01:35, 22 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Note that the second element to the task [http://rosettacode.org/mw/index.php?title=Averages/Pythagorean_means&oldid=75253 was] in the original task description; missed by some, but not others. I decided to move it to make it more prominent. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 01:59, 22 February 2010 (UTC) |
Note that the second element to the task [http://rosettacode.org/mw/index.php?title=Averages/Pythagorean_means&oldid=75253 was] in the original task description; missed by some, but not others. I decided to move it to make it more prominent. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 01:59, 22 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 02:56, 22 February 2010
Why all three together?
I know we already have the Averages/Arithmetic mean task. We needed the other two, they all seemed very small and were related, so I created the one task for all three. It will also allow easy comparison of one languages computation of all three, for example Python has to delve into its standard library for the geometric mean. --Paddy3118 05:31, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
A >= G >= H missing?
It is like going back and fixing the question when you got the answer wrong ;-)
On reading the wp article it seemed like a useful little fact about the Pythagorean means, (apart from the nifty little semi-circular diagram), that I want to have in the RC task. I think it should be re-instated and the examples fixed. --Paddy3118 01:35, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Note that the second element to the task was in the original task description; missed by some, but not others. I decided to move it to make it more prominent. --Paddy3118 01:59, 22 February 2010 (UTC)