Talk:Align columns: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→poll: short or general?: All columns should share the same alignment.) |
(→J solution: Here's my opinion as to which version should be kept.) |
||
| Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
(6 12 (] {~ (?.@$ #)) 'LCR') colAlign text NB. or for each word independently. |
(6 12 (] {~ (?.@$ #)) 'LCR') colAlign text NB. or for each word independently. |
||
Of course, we could include two solutions: lead with the short one, finish with the general one. But that might be overkill. |
Of course, we could include two solutions: lead with the short one, finish with the general one. But that might be overkill. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
: It was only ever my intention to have all columns aligned the same way. I have added (another), note to that effect. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 05:11, 3 December 2008 (UTC) |
: It was only ever my intention to have all columns aligned the same way. I have added (another), note to that effect. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 05:11, 3 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
: I very much like the new code you posted above, and am of the opinion that it should be posted as the sole J solution. Your one-liner is interesting, but what seems to me a better way to handle it would be to link to a Jwiki page where you post it. The version I wrote is best set aside. The desireable features of your new version are (1) emphasis on functional composition, (2) self-documenting qualities of component verbs, and (3) focus on standard programming techniques with constraint to the core primaries. --[[User:TBH|TBH]] 01:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Output Question == |
== Output Question == |
||