Anonymous user
Talk:AVL tree: Difference between revisions
m
→The Existing C++ and Java Versions (i.e. not the elaborate versions)
Line 4:
:: The code for the elaborate version is production standard. Its a bit longer but it is perfectly correct. [[User:NNcNannara|NNcNannara]] ([[User talk:NNcNannara|talk]]) 18:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
::: I appreciate that, but you can't hold other entries on this wiki to the same standard, because many of them are deliberately simplified. [[User:Fwend|Fwend]] ([[User talk:Fwend|talk]]) 18:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
:::: I did some testing and the abbreviated versions of C++ and Java have worse than O(N<sup>2</sup>) instead of O(log N) on insertions and deletions. The C++ commentary made the point itself that it made a second 'pass' to balance the tree. It is this that is killing its performance
==New C++ AVL==
| |||