Talk:AVL tree: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
: As long as the copyright issues aren't going to bite us, that won't be a problem. I advise ''not'' heavily optimising the code, unless it also makes the code easier to understand as a general programmer (of Go, of course; don't worry too much about general programmers of some other random language). We don't aim for optimal solutions here precisely because they tend to be so hard to read, understand and compare. (We also ''can't'' compare performance between languages; matching hardware and language implementation optimisation levels is utterly impossible between different developers' systems. Let some other site worry about that.) –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] ([[User talk:Dkf|talk]]) 16:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC) |
: As long as the copyright issues aren't going to bite us, that won't be a problem. I advise ''not'' heavily optimising the code, unless it also makes the code easier to understand as a general programmer (of Go, of course; don't worry too much about general programmers of some other random language). We don't aim for optimal solutions here precisely because they tend to be so hard to read, understand and compare. (We also ''can't'' compare performance between languages; matching hardware and language implementation optimisation levels is utterly impossible between different developers' systems. Let some other site worry about that.) –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] ([[User talk:Dkf|talk]]) 16:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC) |
||
:: There is some new C#, C++ and Java code, maybe you could port that Donal. |
:: There is some new C#, C++ and Java code, maybe you could port that Donal.[[User:NNcNannara|NNcNannara]] ([[User talk:NNcNannara|talk]]) 12:24, 10 July 2016 (UTC) |
||
==Basic operations== |
==Basic operations== |
||