Anonymous user
Talk:Ackermann function: Difference between revisions
→Scala: Remove complex solution
(added a section header to the first talk section topic (so as to put the TOC in the correct place).) |
(→Scala: Remove complex solution) |
||
Line 55:
: Restored the lost visibility of server-side graphics formulae in the task description [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 14:43, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
==Scala==
I agree, the second solution in Scala was overly complex. As someone wrote the in "needs review":
: The following part of this "heavily recursive" solution is way too complex and does not display the idiom of Scala. Memoization is possible with a stream (See final lesson of the Coursera course "Functional Programming Principles in Scala") which is much simpler and better displays the power of the language.
There should be a memoized version, but keeping the wall of code wasn't going to get it there, so I ripped it out. If anyone wants to review it or reuse it, here's [https://rosettacode.org/mw/index.php?title=Ackermann_function&diff=278347&oldid=278346 the diff where it was removed]. --[[User:Ashawley|Ashawley]] ([[User talk:Ashawley|talk]]) 16:33, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
| |||