User talk:GordonCharlton: Difference between revisions
→Quackery: "probably even structs"
No edit summary |
(→Quackery: "probably even structs") |
||
Line 59:
::::::: 25%, huh? That's pretty doable. Another 30 submissions or so and you'll be halfway there. At least as far as non-draft tasks. As for the combinators, yeah, Factor is probably about 50% combinators, lol. I really love that way of programming, though. I find it extremely flexible because you can tweak them as needed with partial application. But I like the library approach you've taken with Quackery. It's great to stick everything but the kitchen sink in a language, but there's something alluring about staring at a single page of words and having almost nothing feel out of reach. --[[User:Chunes|Chunes]] ([[User talk:Chunes|talk]]) 13:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
:: You wrote: "And probably even structs with just a few more words." <br>Were you thinking of something like this as a starting point? [http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Call_an_object_method#Quackery zen objects] --[[User:GordonCharlton|GordonCharlton]] ([[User talk:GordonCharlton|talk]]) 19:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
| |||