Talk:Range modifications: Difference between revisions
→Proposal:: Drop the two redundant (and Procrustean) bullet points
(→Output quotes?: Fill) |
|||
Line 60:
::: "is done on" – examples ? They may need improvement too.
::: "barred from" (sic) – Where scope is seen for better approaches, variant drafts can illustrate them. There's no place on Rosetta code (the very raison d'etre of which is comparison of alternative approaches) for an appetite for "barring" approaches to solving a problem. Deletionary appetites are better satisfied elsewhere. This is not the place for them. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 14:09, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
:::: One way to resolve this dispute might be to simply add a suitably high range, eg
Start range: "13-14,22-22,100000999999-100001000000"
remove 22 -> "13-14,100000999999-100001000000"
remove 100000999999 -> "13-14,100001000000-100001000000"
remove 100001000000 -> "13-14"
add 100001000001 -> "13-14,100001000001-100001000001"
remove 100001000001 -> "13-14"
:::: That should be enough to deter anyone from using an array of over 100,000,000,000 bools --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 11:19, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
| |||