Talk:Sequence: nth number with exactly n divisors: Difference between revisions
Talk:Sequence: nth number with exactly n divisors (view source)
Revision as of 13:48, 8 March 2021
, 3 years ago→Handy hints: Responded to CalmoSoft.
(→Handy hints: Responded to CalmoSoft.) |
|||
Line 21:
May this is a naive question: Why 2nd term of sequence is not 2 but 3.
<br>2 has exactly 2 divisors: 1 and 2 (CalmoSoft)
: 2 is the '''first''' number with exactly 2 divisors but 3 is the '''second''' such number. So, 3 is the second term of the sequence. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 13:48, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
| |||