Anonymous user
Integer overflow: Difference between revisions
m
added whitespace, indented the tables, aligned the notes.
m (added whitespace, indented the tables, aligned the notes.) |
|||
Line 25:
For 32-bit signed integers:
::::: {|class="wikitable"
!Expression
!Result that does not fit into a 32-bit signed integer
Line 46:
For 64-bit signed integers:
::: {|class="wikitable"
!Expression
!Result that does not fit into a 64-bit signed integer
Line 67:
For 32-bit unsigned integers:
::::: {|class="wikitable"
!Expression
!Result that does not fit into a 32-bit unsigned integer
Line 85:
For 64-bit unsigned integers:
::: {|class="wikitable"
!Expression
!Result that does not fit into a 64-bit unsigned integer
Line 102:
|}
;Notes:
When the integer overflow produces some value print it.▼
▲:* When the integer overflow produces some value, print it.
This should be done for signed and unsigned integers of various sizes supported by the language.▼
:* It should be explicitly noted when an integer overflow is not recognized, the program continues with wrong results.
When a language has no fixed size integer type or when no integer overflow can occur▼
▲:* This should be done for signed and unsigned integers of various sizes supported by the computer programming language.
▲:* When a language has no fixed size integer type, or when no integer overflow can occur for other reasons, this should be noted.
:* It is okay to mention, when a language supports unlimited precision integers, but this task is NOT the place to demonstrate the <br> capabilities of unlimited precision integers.
<br><br>
| |||