Anonymous user
Talk:Rep-string: Difference between revisions
→Clarification: correct spelling of my name, added a reponse and a wish for ... world peace.-- ~~~~
(→Clarification: Gerald - hows the task?) |
(→Clarification: correct spelling of my name, added a reponse and a wish for ... world peace.-- ~~~~) |
||
Line 22:
:::::: The task description was amended twice after I had entered the REXX version 2 example. With the latest task requirements, 101 isn't a rep-string. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 19:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
::::::: Hi
:::::::: Well, it's more wordy. I preferred the original task requirement without the need for the the last part of the first part, and the whole of the third paragraph. I prefer simplicity (a clean definition) and succinctness, but then, it's not my dog. I'm now left with my old arguments ... er, arguing with the original wording, not the amended requirements. So it appears that my statements are out-of-sync with what's what. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 20:02, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
::By the way, almost all programming examples have incorrect output, showing strings to be non-reps, whilest in fact, they are. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 07:22, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
| |||