Jump to content

Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Dialects: Difference between revisions

m
→‎REXX and o-o REXXes: changed spelling of Personal REXX. -- ~~~~
m (final (?) touches)
m (→‎REXX and o-o REXXes: changed spelling of Personal REXX. -- ~~~~)
Line 127:
-----
 
Classic REXX is not object-orientated REXX. To put them under an o-o umbrella would be a disservice to both languages. A classic REXX entered under the ooRexx language would (to me) imply that it would work using ooRexx, and I have no way of testing/verifying that. My main interest is in classic REXX and have no need for object-oriented features. Again: hammer, fly. I test all of my classic REXX program examples (unless noted otherwise) under three classic REXXes: PersonnalPersonal/REXX, Regina (sometimes more than one version when there is a perculiar release-based feature), and R4. [Sometimes I say PC/REXX when I meant to say PersonnalPersonal REXX --- they have the same pedigree.]
 
I don't know what you mean by ''plain'' REXX; the point under discussion is classic REXX vs. the o-o (object-orientated) REXXes.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.