Talk:Sort using a custom comparator: Difference between revisions
Talk:Sort using a custom comparator (view source)
Revision as of 17:36, 20 August 2018
, 5 years ago→Ada example incorrect: Is the output REALLY incorrect?
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (→Ada example incorrect: Is the output REALLY incorrect?) |
|||
Line 33:
Output is incorrect. Set is before set, but has to be first set and then Set. --[[User:GetBreak|GetBreak]] 19:20, 20 August 2018 (EET)
:Um. Just to be clear, you ''did'' read the last line of the task description? The one that states: <blockquote>'''Note:''' Lexicographic order is case-insensitive.</blockquote> It doesn't say anything about sort stability though, or the ordering of words that compare the same, so Set, set is just as valid as set, Set. The AWK and C entries do look a little suspect though.
:BTW, when you mark an entry incorrect, the correct ''(heh)'' format is:
<nowiki>{{incorrect|Language name|Short explanation of what is wrong}}</nowiki>
:If you don't follow that format it becomes difficult to figure out what the problem is and problematic entries won't be reported on the "examples needing attention" page. Thanks. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 17:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
== Some examples remain incorrect ==
| |||